<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;ve been written up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cow.org/c/archives/95/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cow.org/c/archives/95</link>
	<description>Community supported Caltrain notices, one tweet at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:59:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://cow.org/c/archives/95/comment-page-1#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 23:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cow.org/c/?p=95#comment-146</guid>
		<description>Caltrain&#039;s daily expectation of which trainset (consist) will run which service is disrupted every single day, according to more than one of their operations folks.  They have not posted the information about their daily consists, because they can not be as accurate as they want to be (again, according to their operations folks).  That excel spreadsheet which matches a locomotive to the train run would be a decent way to predict, but again they prepare it early in the day, and they have admitted several times their IT infrastructure is lacking.  One morning within the past calendar year (likely March) their server for the signal equipment went out and prevented regular train service for 3 hours, during the morning commute.  

Granted, the baby bullet service has a higher propensity for Bombardier equipment, but they have only 5 Bombardier consists, which prevents all Baby Bullet service schedules to have the Bombardier.

Caltrain has even had offers for free assistance to offer real time updates (ala BART, ACE, MUNI, and many other transit organizations); they have declined all comers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caltrain&#8217;s daily expectation of which trainset (consist) will run which service is disrupted every single day, according to more than one of their operations folks.  They have not posted the information about their daily consists, because they can not be as accurate as they want to be (again, according to their operations folks).  That excel spreadsheet which matches a locomotive to the train run would be a decent way to predict, but again they prepare it early in the day, and they have admitted several times their IT infrastructure is lacking.  One morning within the past calendar year (likely March) their server for the signal equipment went out and prevented regular train service for 3 hours, during the morning commute.  </p>
<p>Granted, the baby bullet service has a higher propensity for Bombardier equipment, but they have only 5 Bombardier consists, which prevents all Baby Bullet service schedules to have the Bombardier.</p>
<p>Caltrain has even had offers for free assistance to offer real time updates (ala BART, ACE, MUNI, and many other transit organizations); they have declined all comers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Paschich</title>
		<link>http://cow.org/c/archives/95/comment-page-1#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>David Paschich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cow.org/c/?p=95#comment-143</guid>
		<description>The @bikecar tweets have this information - the different car types have different bike capacities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The @bikecar tweets have this information &#8211; the different car types have different bike capacities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Goldin</title>
		<link>http://cow.org/c/archives/95/comment-page-1#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Goldin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 01:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cow.org/c/?p=95#comment-142</guid>
		<description>+1 on valerie&#039;s request. Though, as much as I&#039;d like to see that, that shouldn&#039;t go on the regular @caltrain Twitter -- it would totally crowd it up.

It should be a separate account. Though, it seems like there&#039;s a somewhat predictable pattern to whether they have new or old cars...can someone sanity check that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 on valerie&#8217;s request. Though, as much as I&#8217;d like to see that, that shouldn&#8217;t go on the regular @caltrain Twitter &#8212; it would totally crowd it up.</p>
<p>It should be a separate account. Though, it seems like there&#8217;s a somewhat predictable pattern to whether they have new or old cars&#8230;can someone sanity check that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valerie Aurora</title>
		<link>http://cow.org/c/archives/95/comment-page-1#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Valerie Aurora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cow.org/c/?p=95#comment-138</guid>
		<description>I wonder, would it be useful to anyone else to add updates on which equipment a train is using?  In my ideal worlds, I would only ride the bullet with the new (Bombardier) cars - I will happily wait for the next train if I know it has the new cars.  But as far as I can tell, there is no way to predict which equipment any particular train will be using - other than riders at SF/SJ tweeting about it.

Oh, and thank you very much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder, would it be useful to anyone else to add updates on which equipment a train is using?  In my ideal worlds, I would only ride the bullet with the new (Bombardier) cars &#8211; I will happily wait for the next train if I know it has the new cars.  But as far as I can tell, there is no way to predict which equipment any particular train will be using &#8211; other than riders at SF/SJ tweeting about it.</p>
<p>Oh, and thank you very much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted E</title>
		<link>http://cow.org/c/archives/95/comment-page-1#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 14:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cow.org/c/?p=95#comment-136</guid>
		<description>I saw the article and the TV spot last night.
You probably have a whole bunch of new folks on the list now

Side note: was happy to see fearless leader&quot; was using a Hackintosh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the article and the TV spot last night.<br />
You probably have a whole bunch of new folks on the list now</p>
<p>Side note: was happy to see fearless leader&#8221; was using a Hackintosh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samner</title>
		<link>http://cow.org/c/archives/95/comment-page-1#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>samner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cow.org/c/?p=95#comment-135</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m famous!!! :-p thanks for the great service ravi!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m famous!!! :-p thanks for the great service ravi!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

